Strujevics began proceedings against the newspaper and Ozolins in April of 1999, asking for a retraction of the information, which he said was defamatory, an apology for statements the articles made and “moral” damages of about 10,000 lats (just over 14,300 euro).

Many hearings and appeals followed, consistently backing Strujevics, and eventually reached the Latvian Supreme Court Senate, which dismissed an appeal by Diena and Ozolins. European judges in Strasbourg overturned that ruling, however, and unanimously decided the case was a violation of freedom of expression of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Diena was awarded 10,292 euro in damages, and 3,000 euro for costs and expenses.