Village Voice executives arrested in Phoenix
By Leah McBride Mensching, Friday 19 October 2007 at 21:22 :: Press Freedom & Laws :: #728 :: rss
Two Village Voice Media executives were arrested in Phoenix Thursday on charges that a story published earlier that day in The Phoenix New Times, owned by Village Voice, revealed grand jury secrets.
Jim Larkin, chief executive, and Michael Lacey, the executive editor, were arrested at their homes Thursday night because of an article they wrote revealing that the Village Voice Media company, its executives, reporters and names of the readers of its Web site had been subpoenaed by a special prosecutor, the New York Times reported Friday.
The prosecutor has been charged with investigating allegations that the newspaper violated a law by publishing the home address of Maricopa Sheriff Joe Arpaio on the newspaper's Web site more than three years ago, the Times reported. The paper has been in an ongoing struggle with Arpaio since it published a series of articles on his real estate dealings.
In an article published Thursday, The Phoenix New Times stated:
“In a breathtaking abuse of the United States Constitution, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, and their increasingly unhinged cat's paw, special prosecutor Dennis Wilenchik, used the grand jury to subpoena "all documents related to articles and other content published by Phoenix New Times newspaper in print and on the Phoenix New Times Web site, regarding Sheriff Joe Arpaio from January 1, 2004 to the present."
Every note, tape, and record from every story written about Sheriff Arpaio by every reporter over a period of years.
In addition to the omnibus subpoena, which referred to our writer Stephen Lemons directly, reporters John Dougherty and Paul Rubin were targeted with individual subpoenas.
More alarming still, Arpaio, Thomas, and Wilenchik subpoenaed detailed information on anyone who has looked at the New Times Web site since 2004.
Every individual who looked at any story, review, listing, classified, or retail ad over a period of years.
The seemingly picayune matter of Sheriff Arpaio's home address getting printed at the bottom of an opinion column on our Internet site — and the very real issue of commercial property investments the sheriff hid from public view — have now erupted into a courtroom donnybrook against a backdrop of illegal immigration disputes, Mexican drug cartels, the Minutemen, political ambition, and turf disputes between prosecutors and the judiciary.”
To read the full article, click here.




Comments
No comment.
Post comment