WAN-IFRA

Shaping the Future of the Newspaper

Date

Wed - 22.05.2013


Amy Hadfield

Amy Hadfield's picture

1. Profile

You are
Mrs.
First name
Amy
Last name
Hadfield

History

Member for
47 weeks 1 day

Blog entries

Shrewd print and online strategies have helped New York magazine to defy the global downturn in magazine and newspaper market. In an article published by AdAge, Matthew Flamm writes that the magazine has experienced its best year in a decade, and it’s not hard to understand why. 2012 has seen the title win a flurry of awards, expand its online presence and attract national and international audiences.

It’s a story that sits at odds with the fortunes of the American magazine industry in general. The Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC) reported a 10 percent decrease in magazine newsstand sales and a month ago the Publishers Information Bureau revealed that advertising has suffered an 8.8 percent year-on-year drop. Newsweek’s financial crisis may be the most extreme example of a magazine in decline, but other major magazine brands at Condé Nast, Time Inc. and others are suffering from loss of ad and circulation revenue.

So how exactly has this supposedly regional magazine managed to boost revenues and attract 4.8 million unique online users in August alone?

For the most part, the answer is rather simple: foresight. While Newsweek’s owners are planning on making the title a digital-first enterprise in the near future, New York has been establishing an online presence since 2004. Eight years ago investment banker Bruce Wasserstein acquired both a New York encumbered by economic difficulties and poor editorial choices and its website NYMetro.com (which would later become today’s nymag.com) for $55 million. Under the guidance of Editor-in-Chief Adam Moss, New York soon began to flaunt the potential of its website. A re-launch in 2006 elevated the site from its status as the magazine’s lowly-sidekick and made it an editorial force in its own right.

By featuring blogs on general-interest subjects like sports, food and fashion, which could be of interest to readers beyond New York’s five boroughs, the site attracted an impressive national following. Today, 80 percent of all visitors to nymag.com come from outside New York. Advertisers were quick to interest themselves in a site that had managed to create a space for itself in the national arena and online advertising has contributed to a 6 percent rise in the title’s revenue. In turn, the website sought to fully exploit the most profitable section of its business – fashion advertising - by increasing and developing its lifestyle coverage. Last month The Cut blog was expanded in attempts to transform it into “a high-end fashion magazine with the scrappiness of a blog.”

Moss and his team have sought to achieve a similar breadth of reach through the print product, too. Cover stories range from being incredibly New York-centric to covering political figures and issues that have little bearing on the city itself.

New York magazine has not been entirely unaffected by the present economic climate, though any pain experienced has been minimal. Circulation fell by 2 percent this year and reader numbers are generally stagnant, but thanks to increases in cover prices reader-revenue has grown.

Unfortunately, the forward-thinking in evidence at New York will have little, if any, impact on the fortunes of other embattled news weeklies, whose editors are too busy trying make online content pay to develop and build a time machine.

Sources: PaidContent, AdAge, NYTimes, Washington Post

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-28 17:59

From France comes the mildly surprising news that Le Huffington Post has become the country’s premier online-only news source.

Figures released this morning by Médiamétrique/Netratings show that the site received 1.916 million unique visitors in July 2012, beating Rue 89 (1.476m unique users), one of France’s most popular websites, into second place. The rest of the rankings see Le Nouvel Observateur’s site Le Plus in third place (1.262m), Atlantico (1.258m) in fourth, fifth place taken by Slate France (966,000) and paying site Médiapart comes sixth with 578,000 unique visitors.

The success of the Huffington brand is not a shock in and of itself. In its prime, Le HuffPo’s US parent-site was able to surpass even The New York Times’s traffic rate and its mix of serious news, gossip, celebrity columnists, freelance (mainly unpaid) contributors and social media interaction means that The Huffington Post’s premise is one that has been rolled out around the world. However, only two months ago a review of France’s newest online information sites suggested that Le Huffington Post was still trailing behind its main rivals, with 6.7 total visitors and 14 million page views to Rue89’s 10 million visits and 37 million views. 

News that the site now dominates the French online news arena is also striking because France’s web-based press is generally perceived to be a crowded market and a platform for hard-hitting journalism and serious content. Not exactly a category The Huffington Post naturally falls into. While Rue89 was honoured at this year’s Online Journalism Awards for "general excellence" as the best non-Anglophone news site, Arianna Huffington’s business was been widely denigrated by some of the media world’s most respected figures. Bill Keller famously penned an article describing the media maven as “the queen of aggregation… who has discovered that if you take celebrity gossip, adorable kitten videos, posts from unpaid bloggers and news reports from other publications, array them on your Web site and add a left-wing soundtrack, millions of people will come.”

How then to explain the frequently fluffy HuffPo France’s achievement?

Since its French debut the site has generated a healthy flow of traffic. By February, a month after it went online, Le Huffington Post recorded 4.2 million unique users, 5.6 million visits in total and 11.2 million page views. At barely four weeks old, the youngest member of the French pure-player family was ranked 12th out of the Hexagon’s 50 most-visited news sites. The impressive stats were not however solely attributable to the efforts of Le HuffPost. In France, the site works in partnership with Le Monde and the agreement between the two publications saw Le Huffington Post take over the French newspaper’s pre-existing news site, Lepoint.fr. Visitors to Le Point were redirected to Le HuffPo’s homepage, which undoubtedly made a significant contribution to the new website’s traffic levels.

Controversy surrounding the appointment of Anne Sinclair, wife of Dominique Strauss-Kahn, as editorial director served to add to the hype that preceded the site’s launch, raising Le HuffPo’s profile before it had even begun posting. And yet nine months down the line, it is a little more difficult to attribute to the curiosity factor. Sinclair’s contacts in the world of politics is in all likelihood a key reason for the website’s ability to recruit a wealth of prominent politicians as guest bloggers and a comparison with the fortunes of its British counterpart goes a long way to explaining why Le Huffington Post is giving its French competitors a run for their money.

Questioned by The Times, Senior Vice President of AOL Huffington Post Media Group Jimmy Maymann pointed to a lack of contacts and networks on the British political scene: “We still need to see more agenda-setting and more breaking news. Just like Arianna knows everybody on Capitol Hill, we need somebody who knows everyone in Westminster and can bring in stories. In the UK, we didn’t go out and hire a local ‘Arianna’ — we went with a promising new talent instead as editor-in-chief.” The estranged wife of the former head of the IMF, Sinclair certainly has the connections to qualify as France’s Ms. Huffington.

The Huffington Post UK has come in for much criticism from the British press, in no small part because of its apparent lack of innovation. Though the US news scene may have been crying out for a liberal media voice when Arianna Huffington first created the HuffPo brand, Britain was well-served by The Guardian’s digital offering, leading to comments that a similar competing site was redundant. Comscore figures show that at present online titles such as The Telegraph garner eight times the number of unique monthly visitors who frequent HuffPo UK, and there is speculation that AOL’s decision not to team up with a national news title is directly responsible for the disappointing browser statistics.

In the same way that the UK site’s inability to offer British consumers a different perspective on the news is largely responsible for its lack of impact, the very fact that Le HuffPo’s "softer" content exploits a niche in the French online news market may be a central facet of its current success. Appealing to a gap in the market was the secret to the original Huffington Post’s success state-side, though said gap was a political, not editorial, one.

Médiamétrique’s data could not have come at a better time for Ms Huffington, who unveiled L’Huffington Post in Italy two days ago. Produced in association with Gruppo L’Espresso, publisher of La Repubblica and L’Espresso, the site is already being suggested as a potential "game changer" for the Italian media landscape.

Sources: Le Monde, Editors Weblog (1) (2), Erwanngaucher.com

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-27 18:21

If reports in this morning’s Daily Telegraph are accurate, News International’s frosty relationship with Google may be thawing.

After two self-imposed years in the wilderness, quality news titles owned by Rupert Murdoch’s British publishing division could find themselves re-included in Google search results as soon as next month.

The Times and The Sunday Times websites were originally removed from Google’s search index at the same time that paywalls were introduced at the thetimes.co.uk (then timesonline.co.uk), as part of News Int.’s attempts to stop users accessing content for free. Murdoch’s objection to consumers viewing premium content free of charge is no secret, and the media mogul hasn’t pulled any punches in his criticisms of Google’s operating policies.

News International has yet to confirm the rumours, but signs of a rapprochement between parent company News Corp and the Internet search giant have been surfacing since the beginning of this year. As the SFN blog recently noted, Murdoch-owned Fox Television signed a video-on-demand agreement with Google, in a tacit acknowledgment of the tech company’s influence and reach.

Outlining the company’s plans to block Google back in 2009, News Corp’s chief digital officer at the time Jonathan Miller shrugged off the importance of Google’s role in directing traffic to The Times’s online edition: “The traffic which comes in from Google brings a consumer who more often than not read one article and then leaves the site. That is the least valuable of traffic to us… the economic impact [of not having content indexed by Google] is not as great as you might think. You can survive without it.”

It’s a stance the company now appears to regret, as its hard-line paywall failed to bring in the hoped-for volume of readers and revenues and saw a steep drop in visitor numbers. The Times newspapers are something of a money hole for News Corp.’s UK publishing interests, and as the company prepares to split into two separate entities questions are increasingly being asked as to how sustainable loss-making titles will be once divorced from the revenues raised by the company’s entertainment businesses.

The new arrangement wouldn’t see The Times completely relax its stance on content restriction. Only the first two sentences of an article would be made visible, but even this limited view would increase the site’s views per page statistics and potentially encourage a greater number of subscriptions.

Today’s rumours, if proven to be true, will likely be seen as an embarrassing climb-down for the company. News International had hoped that other papers would follow their lead both in blocking Google and introducing paying subscriptions at quality titles. Its partial u-turn will raise questions over the efficacy of inflexible paywalls and closely guarded content. The New York Times and Financial Times, with their metered systems, have proven that the paid-content model is lucrative in certain forms, but the obstacles faced by News International add weight to the argument that in the age of digital there is little profit to be made from fencing-off content.

Sources: The Telegraph, The Drum, Paid Content

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-26 15:19

Hotly anticipated by the news media industry since it was first proposed as a rival for The Economist and The Financial Times, Atlantic Media’s new online business magazine Quartz finally went live yesterday. The launch was always going to be a closely scrutinised affair thanks to Quartz’s mobile-first, digital-only direction, and journalists have been quick to highlight the publication’s decision to shun native apps in favour of an app-like site.

A simple, uncluttered homepage greets visitors to qz.com. Rejecting the much-adhered-to practice of producing news website layouts that resemble newspaper front pages, Quartz features a single story on its main page with a bar on the left side of the screen that leads readers to "top," "latest" and "popular" stories. The navigation bar at the top of the screen is, as promised, categorised according to "phenomena," "not beats."

As is made strikingly clear by its design, the online publication is, first and foremost, intended to be viewed via mobile phone and tablet devices. Interviewed by Lean Back 2.0, Quartz’s Editor-in-Chief Kevin Delaney revealed the three reasons for this mobile-first focus: “One, the data is very clear that the user base for the devices is large and growing quickly... Secondly, we’re hoping to build a service and news product for global business leaders, and one of the defining attributes of these global leaders is that they are incredibly mobile…Lastly, there are tremendous opportunities for innovation on mobile and tablet platforms. In terms of the user interface, we’re really at the beginning of the road for user interfaces for news consumption.”

For most digital news products, a desire to target the mobile market would normally mean that an Android/ iPad friendly app is revealed in conjunction with the website. Quartz however has decided that its interests lie elsewhere – on our old friend the Internet. Instead of obliging readers to download applications individually tailored to a particular tablet or smartphone, the magazine is accessible through any Internet browser on any device. Its responsive design means that the site automatically reformats to fit whatever platform is used to view it, be it Blackberry, Android, iPad or Windows.

With the sole website model, neither time nor money need be spent on developing tablet or mobile friendly versions of the magazine and changes can be made without being approved by an appstore. It’s a tactic that permits the Quartz team complete control over their platform and means the magazine is in a position to have greater reach than would be the case were it to be designed specifically for one device (take note, The Daily).

Questions of reach and control have previously attracted other news organisations to abandon the Apple App Store in favour of HTML5 web-based apps. Following a dispute with Apple over changes the tech company made to its subscription rules, The Financial Times became one of the first major news titles to connect with iPad and Android readers through the web without a native app.

Rob Grimshaw, Managing Director of FT.com insisted that the switch could not only be attributed to a falling out with Apple. As much as the move was sparked by the publication’s reluctance to pay 30 per cent of all its subscription revenues to Apple, ultimately it was an "attempt to ensure the FT could scale quickly across different devices and platforms." In the space of just 10 months, the FT’s web app attracted 2 million users.

At its launch on Monday, Quartz was affected by some technical glitches, and the site itself is far from perfect. Navigation is sometimes confusing (even something as fundamental as returning to the homepage causes a problem or two) but as Delaney writes in his welcome note to readers, this is Quartz 1.0. The site’s progress over the coming months will be subjected to as much scrutiny as its launch, as other news outlets weigh up the pros and cons of the innovations trialled both by Quartz and USAToday. With publishers being encouraged to question their relationships with technology companies who have little interest in the content transmitted by their devices, others could soon be keen to follow Quartz’s lead.

Sources: Poynter, Nieman Lab, AllThingsD, The Guardian, Media Briefing, Editors Weblog,

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-25 18:21

Two weeks ago when the SFN blog examined the National Readership Survey (NRS)’s report on print and online news consumption, we suggested that encouraging digital figures for quality titles could be of great interest to advertisers. Looking at the same figures, The Guardian’s Investigations Executive Editor, David Leigh, had an altogether more radical idea: a £2 pound levy on broadband services.

Thanks to the BBC’s free-to-access, taxpayer-funded news website, British news consumers will always have access to reliable, up-to-date news reports. This, Leigh argues, means that the paywall model will “never really work in the UK context.” 

The noted investigative journalist reasons, in an article posted to MediaGuardian, that the simplest and most effective means of solving the financial dilemma faced by British news publishers is a “small levy on UK broadband providers [that] could be distributed to news providers in proportion to their UK online readership.” Brits are not particularly inclined to pay for online news, Leigh continues, but almost 20 million UK households are, and will continue to be, willing to pay for essential broadband subscriptions.

A levy of £2 per month added on to standard broadband contracts (which usually begin at a basic rate of £15 a month), would raise around £500 million per year and would see the Guardian Media Group, the Telegraph Group and Associated Newspapers receive £100 million p.a., and Independent titles would benefit to the tune of £40 million. The Sun, the nation’s most popular newspaper, would stand to gain £50 million a year, but Leigh’s proposals would restrict the amount of money that would be available to the News International sites that place online content behind a paywall. Leigh also insists that restrictions would apply to exclude content aggregators from benefitting from the scheme.

Eager to avoid a situation in which a state-subsidised press would be open to government interference, Leigh’s levy would be regulated in the same manner as the BBC licence fee: collected by an independent body and “operationally ring fenced against ‘state intervention.’ ”

Hailed as “the magic bullet we’ve been seeking” by Roy Greenslade, who is a professor at City University and also writes for The Guardian, the plans for a broadband levy are an alternative to the kind of direct government subsidies that maintain newspapers in Norway, Italy and Sweden.

That said, it is nonetheless unclear as to whether other large newspaper groups in Britain are as in need of subsidies as Guardian Media Group titles, whose financial woes are well documented. Last week the Daily Mail’s website reported more than 100 million unique users in August, making it the world’s most visited English-language website, and Britain’s most popular news site. Under Leigh’s proposals, MailOnline’s majority share of the UK’s online news audience would entitle it to the largest portion of money raised by the "broadband tax" – despite its being the most profitable of all news websites. Meanwhile the Telegraph titles achieved pre-tax profits of £54.5 million.

Greenslade touches upon some of the obstacles that Leigh’s idea faces, including the participation of ISPs. There is little to recommend the proposals to the Internet service providers who would be at the forefront of the "tax-raising" process. An extra two pounds added to a monthly bill may appear to be a small amount, but for bills of £15 it represents just over a 13 percent increase in the amount each household would pay - a bitter pill that would stick in the throats of many customers, and which would be tough for companies to market.

Comparisons with the BBC's licence fee also pose problems for Leigh's subsidy plans. The licence fee issue is fraught with political wrangling, and sees the BBC obliged to negotiate financial terms with ministers on what is frequently a yearly basis. Likening the broadband subsidy to the Corporation’s payment system inevitably calls to mind the current freezing of the licence fee and the resulting loss of 2,000 positions within the organisation. How would newspapers charged with holding politicians to account cope in a similar situation?

Another consideration would be the willingness of broadband users to subsidise newspaper titles that they choose not to read. When choosing which national title to follow, readers often opt for the publication that best reflects their political or social views. Convincing a reader of The Daily Telegraph that they ought to be supporting The Guardian, or a Guardian subscriber that they should be contributing to the financial health of the Daily Mail could be a hard sell.

The argument that news gathering organisations are a public service and vital to a healthy democracy is advanced by both Leigh and Greenslade, and is nigh on impossible to contest. However, there is some confusion in Leigh’s argument as to whether the subsidy would be used to protect the print industry or to aid news-publishing companies in general. Although he asserts that “when the day comes that the newspapers are forced to stop printing altogether, it will be a disaster for democracy,” can we really say that the end of print would be the end of the news’s essential role? The NRS figures were striking because they proved that news titles continue to have a healthy readership online, despite a drop in print circulation. Readers are not disappearing, and there is continuing demand for quality news reporting. That reporting does of course have to be paid for, but using a subsidy to bolster a failing section of the newspaper industry would seem to be counter-intuitive.

Leigh’s levy will provide food for thought in an industry ready to debate all suggestions relating to its future sustainability, but in its present incarnation his proposal of a blanket scheme designed to raise money through a service not directly linked to news companies themselves would seem to raise more problems than it solves. 

Sources: The Guardian (1) (2), PaidContent, SFN blog, Editors Weblog

Image: Flickr user aubergene, under creative commons licence

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-24 17:01

As Google News prepares to celebrate its tenth birthday on 22 September, the aggregation site could find that it finally has friends in the world of journalism willing to R.S.V.P.

From the moment the search engine giant launched its news service in 2002, Google News has found itself embroiled in bitter feuds with journalists and news outlets concerned that the internet company would siphon-off readers and make money on the back of ‘stolen’ content.

Using a sophisticated algorithm to ‘harvest’ stories from 4,000 international news sites, the original incarnation of Google News produced a constantly updated index of breaking news headlines from around the world. Today the ‘Googlebot’ aggregates stories from over 50,000 news sources and is frequently the first port of call for readers chasing a particular news item or wanting a global news perspective concentrated in one location. Unveiling the Google News project for the first time, then-Google product manager Marissa Meyer announced: “From the reader perspective, this changes news reading habits, because (usually) you pick a source and pick the story that interests you. With this service, you pick the story that interests you and then pick the source.”

Google News’s prioritisation of stories over sources was always going to incense newspapers, which were (and still are) struggling to cope with online media companies luring readers away from established print brands. News industry leaders frequently railed against the ‘digital vampire’ that used articles produced by news outlets to create what was effectively a rival news site.

Strained relations between Google News and news media businesses deteriorated even further after the aggregation site introduced advertising on its pages. The internet behemoth’s choice to run advertisements alongside articles and headlines it had amassed from other sites, and refusing to pass on any of the revenue it made from them to the original sources, meant that Google News would profit from content that it hadn’t produced itself. It was a move that seemed to undermine previous assurances from Google executives that the news service intended to “help traditional media in a new environment”.

While Google News creator Krishna Bharat couldn’t understand why his brain-child was not more loved by the newspaper industry, high-profile figures from the world of publishing were vocal in their criticism of the ‘vampiric’ service. Samuel Zell, owner of Tribune Co. vented his exasperation at online aggregators, demanding: "If all of the newspapers in America did not allow Google to steal their content, how profitable would Google be? Not very”.

Yet, with Google News set to embark upon on its second decade of operations, now could be the moment that the news industry comes round to the “newspaper killer” ’s presence.

In 2010, responding to the many criticisms levelled at Google News by the news media, Eric Schmidt (Google CEO from 2001 to 2011) published an op-ed in the WSJ calling for a “change in tone” in the debate. It was, Schmidt argued, time to recognise that the two factions had to “work together to fulfil the promise of journalism in the digital age.”

Though he has since stepped down as chief executive officer, Schmidt’s appeal seems to have sparked a rethinking of Google/publisher relations. Google, aware no doubt that its aggregation service relies on having a treasure trove of quality journalism to rifle through, has since released a number of tools with a view to endearing itself to journalists and publishers. The introduction of site maps enabled publishers to bring a human touch to the algorithm-run system: human editors at news organisations have greater control over which articles are included on the Google News homepage. A new tagging scheme allows news outlets to ‘flag’ stories for Google’s algorithms, and the Fast Flip service, which bundles breaking and recent news stories, was produced in collaboration with publishers including The New York Times, The Washington Post and Propublica.

Media organisations appear to be thawing in their attitude to Google’s online supremacy. Nine months after he condemned the technology company as “the piracy leaderRupert Murdoch led 21st Century Fox into a partnership deal   in a move seen to indicate the media industry’s new-found willingness to come to terms with Google’s undeniable influence.

Working with Google would appear to make good business sense for traditional media companies struggling to generate profit through online content. Love it or loathe it, Google News arguably occupies one of the most powerful positions in news media. Search results powered by Google News are followed by one billion unique users every week. The Atlantic’s Megan Garber calculates that for news outlets in total, Google News generates 4 billion clicks a month – 1 billion from Google News itself, and 3 billion from search results.

There are however on-going disagreements between Google and sections of the news industry. French publishers eager to challenge Google’s dominance of the online advertising market place launched La Place Media at the beginning of September, and Belgian newspapers are involved in a long-standing dispute over copyright with Google News.

Its global dominance and ability to make a financial success of content that smaller news companies are desperately trying to monetise means that Google News is unlikely to find its way into the hearts of journalists, news editors and publishers. But even if they withhold their affection, these same figures will in all probability continue to work with the aggregator, thanks to the sheer volume of traffic it directs to their sites. Sending a tenth birthday card to Google News, publishers world-wide might wish it ‘best wishes’, but would probably stop well short of ‘love.’

Sources: The Atlantic (1) (2), Editors Weblog (1) (2) (3), C/NET.com, Economic Times India

 

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-21 18:13

Times are tough down under. Embattled traditional media outlets in Australia are being beaten in the struggle for advertising revenue by online media companies.

Where once classified advertisements were rivers of revenue that sustained print titles for almost two centuries, they are now more commonly found at specialist sites that are presenting a serious challenge to newspaper’s position in the advertising market.

According to the Commercial Economic Advisory Service of Australia, 2012 is the first year in which online ad spend in Australia overtook that of newspapers. The dominance of new media companies focused on the sale of classified ads online, in particular Carsales.com, recruitment site SEEK, and real-estate site REA, contributed greatly to the change, which saw the online market receive 27 per cent of the country’s total advertising dollars. Newspapers attracted 24 per cent.

Reuters reports that the shift in advertising dominance from traditional media to online companies is a relatively new phenomenon in Australia. As recently as April the value of traditional media organisations was greater than that of online companies, but in the intervening months the worth of newspaper outlets and television broadcasters plummeted.

Digital media brands have experienced impressive rates of growth at the same time that news publishers in Australia have been forced to cuts jobs and close printing presses. While the companies that own the websites Caresales.com, REA and SEEK have a combined market worth of roughly $6.2 billion, Fairfax News and Media – Australia’s oldest and largest media company – posted losses of $2.732 for the financial year 2012 after a $3 billion write-down of its media businesses. News Ltd, News Corp’s Australian publishing arm, found itself in a similar position at the end of the financial year, having written down the value of its assets by $2.8 billion.

Looking to the future, executives at publishing companies are predicting that the weak state of the advertising market will continue to affect profits well into next year. Speaking to The Australian, News Corp’s chief operating officer Chase Carey admitted that “overall this [publishing] segment is essentially expected to be flat in 2013,” due to falling advertising revenues.

Traditional media companies are making efforts to catch up with the digital transition and attract online ad spend, but have yet to establish their digital ventures as reliable sources of revenue. At the beginning of this week, Fairfax revealed a new iPad app for The Canberra Times, to go with the apps it released over a year ago for The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald. However, as highlighted by the Talking New Media blog, the apps have little financial value from a publishing perspective. For the time being, no subscription is required to access the content, which for the most part is taken from the websites of the respective publications, and none of the apps carry advertising. Though it is believed that a paywall will eventually be introduced, requiring consumers to subscribe on a monthly or yearly basis, the slow process of monetising digital ventures is indicative of the struggle traditional news outlets have faced in attempting to update their business model and operations.

The digital-only firms that are currently thriving in the Australian advertising market have the rather obvious advantage of being made for the online world. Newspapers on the other hand are required to restructure and resize – a process that take time and money at a time when most news organisations have little of either resource to spare.

In a speech at PANPA’s Future Forum conference in Sydney, Fairfax’s Gary Linnell gave an insight into Australian publishers’ often difficult relationship with digital media. As traditional news companies attempt to “sprint out of the blocks trying to make up for 10, 15, 20 years of absolute […] blissful ignorance… the entire industry”, Linnell said, “is trying to work out whether or not the escape tunnel we’re trying to dig into the digital world will be big enough for all of us to get through.”

Sources: Reuters, The Australian (1) (2) Talking New Media

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-20 17:32

When journalist and television presenter Luca Telese acrimoniously parted ways with Il Fatto Quotidiano at the beginning of summer, he promised to create a rival newspaper “to say what many on the left think but few say”. Now, a mere three months later, that is exactly what he has done, assembling a thirty person editorial staff, replete with former Fatto journalists (seven in total), contributors from some of Italy’s most renowned national titles, and interns.

Pubblico hit Italian newsstands on Tuesday 18th September, and on first sight it would be easy to mistake it for another newspaper entirely. The graphics and logo are clearly borrowed from Libération, France’s leading left-wing paper, while the slogan “Not funded by public money” bears more than a passing resemblance to a similar declaration found on Il Fatto’s front page. The paper will be published seven days a week, in every region of Italy barring Sicily and the southern part of Calabria. Though some commentators believe the newspaper’s content might be better suited to a weekly publication, the paper is no doubt hoping that it will be in a better position to attract and maintain a loyal readership by establishing a daily reading habit amongst consumers.

Positioning itself as a champion of the voiceless majority in Italian society, the front page of Pubblico’s inaugural edition features an image of a call centre worker with a phone cord wrapped around her neck. An accompanying editorial spread across the second and third page decries the problems faced by call centre operatives in Italy, described as the “slaves of the third millennium”. The plight of workers and protest groups is evidently a key concern of Telese’s new venture: Pussy riot also featured heavily in the first issue, and in the director’s ‘user manual’ Telese states that working Italians ignored by the mainstream press will be given a platform.

In the same way that Il Fatto Quotidiano was conceived as a reaction against an Italian national press reluctant to level serious criticisms against prominent political figures, so Telese has produced Pubblico as a means of responding to what he believes are the failures of his former employers. Telese’s departure from Il Fatto sparked something of a media storm in Italy, as the reporter showed he wasn’t afraid to lambast culture and practices at a newspaper that prides itself on being one of the most credible news sources in a media environment still dominated by the Berlusconi family.

In the months following Silvio Berlusconi’s ousting from office, tensions between Telese and Il Fatto’s vice director Marco Travaglio bubbled to the surface, as the two held very different ideas on the direction the paper should take. Il Cavaliere had long been the focus of Il Fatto’s political coverage, and the paper proved to be a rallying point for Italians disillusioned by its scandal-hit government. With Berlusconi gone, Telese claims he thought everything at Il Fatto ought to change, while Travaglio thought the title could continue as it had before. In an interview with Il Corriere della Sera, Telese states that this is why he left, “because you can’t continue to cut off the heads of corpses lying on the battlefield at the end of a war.” 

Pubblico then is described by its director as a paper that will be scathing of politics – but with the view of saving, rather than destroying it. Telese has gone to great pains to highlight the youthful and forward-thinking approach of his editorial team (average age of 35), who he hopes will turn the paper into ‘a voice for the young,’ to speak out against the cabal of 60 year olds who usually direct and write for news titles. Every journalist at the paper has been equipped with a smartphone, so that every one of them can serve as ‘a kind of photojournalist’, able to compile reports ‘in the field’ in a move Telese hopes will produce avant-garde journalism.

For its part, Il Fatto has mocked Pubblico for what is deemed to be a confused mission statement. The new title’s motto ‘on behalf of the last and the first’ (an initially confusing sentiment that Telese clarified in a memo to journalists) is dismissed as condescending paternalism by Pierfranco Pellizzetti, who suggests that Pubblico’s desire to represent “the last – all those who the crisis and speculation are trying to expel from civil life” and “the first, those of real merit, of excellence, of talent who are this country’s only hope for salvation” is a case of having one’s cake and eating it too.

Yet, despite the bad feeling that exists between the two publications, Pubblico is nonetheless willing to learn from Il Fatto’s successes – foremost of which has been its ability to establish a profitable business model for a news print product. Italy has seen a number of journalism start-ups in previous years, but the majority, including Linkiesta and Il Post, have been centred around online and digital products, reflecting the general belief in the news industry that ‘digital first’ is the only way forward.  Pubblico however is based on an integrated print and digital model, with smartphone and tablet apps offering single copies for 1€ and a year’s subscription for 130€. Attempts to keep production costs to a minimum mean that in its present form Pubblico consists of 24 full colour pages, arranged in a tabloid format.

The print product is on sale for 1.50€ and needs a circulation of nine thousand copies in order to recuperate its original investment of €750,000. Still, in Italy’s current newspaper landscape where one copy is sold per every ten fans and followers of a newspaper, it could be some time before the paper breaks even. Though it arguably targets the same young, liberal audience as Il Fatto, Pubblico has not benefitted from the same amount of hype that saw its rival amass over 3.5 million subscriptions before its first edition was even printed.

Over the course of the coming months, Telese and his team will be watching to see whether readers will follow their lead and switch allegiance from Il Fatto to Pubblico. 

Sources: Il Giornalaio, Il Fatto Quotidiano, EJO, Corriere della Sera, Pubblico 

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-19 18:56

At the beginning of this week, The Guardian published its 12th annual list of the 100 most powerful people in the media industry. Covering broadcast media, newspapers and magazines, new media, marketing, advertising and PR, the Guardian Media 100 is compiled by a panel of industry insiders who take into account the economic, cultural and political influence individual media figures exert in the UK.

Unsurprisingly, given the size of their audiences and revenues, social media and technology companies dominate the top 10. Google CEO Larry Page takes pole position, reflecting his company’s attempts to move into the social networking market with Google+. Twitter’s Dick Costolo takes second place, while both Sir Jonathan Ive for Apple and Android/ Google’s Andy Rubin (third and sixth place respectively) are feted for the role they played in developing tablet products and changing the way we access information online.

The sole representative of the news publishing business in this year’s top 10 is Paul Dacre, whose position at number seven in the list remains unchanged from last year. The Daily Mail’s editor-in-chief has seen his paper flourish in a year when rival titles have been dogged by allegations of phone-hacking and revenue losses. Thanks in large part to the successes of the MailOnline, which is vying with the nytimes.com to be the world’s most popular English language website and turned a profit for the first time this year, Viscount Rothermere, head of the Daily Mail and General Trust, has climbed seven places since 2011, reaching number 35.

Presenting an overview of this year’s results, The Guardian’s media correspondent and MediaGuardian 100 judge John Plunkett suggests that 2012’s rankings reflect a year in which the Leveson inquiry acted as “the biggest force for change in the media landscape." True, for the first time ever Rupert Murdoch missed out on a position as one of the 10 most powerful people on the British media landscape, but a look at the MG100 micro-lists, ranking the influence of each individual according to particular areas of the media, tells a slightly different story.

In 2011, the GM100 panel estimated that Rupert Murdoch was the most powerful figure in the newspapers and magazine sector, and placed his son James third. Murdoch junior’s decision to stand down from News International in the wake of the News of the World scandal means he lost much of his influence over the British publishing business in 2012. His father on the other hand has seen himself relegated to a perfectly respectable second place, behind Dacre – hardly a sign of waning influence. In fact, the panel cited Rupert Murdoch’s continuing investment in British newspapers, with the introduction of The Sun on Sunday and ongoing relationships with key political figures in the UK as reasons why it “would be unwise to write the man off, or dismiss the influence he still wields.”

The "power by sector" lists also suggest that in the previous 12 months news publishers and journalists have had little impact on the world of digital media. Whilst online companies like Google, Amazon, Facebook and Twitter present stiff competition in the digital category, it is perhaps a little surprising that a greater number of individuals from news companies were not able to muscle their way onto the list. Were it not for the MailOnline’s Martin Clarke, not a single news title would feature amongst the sector’s most influential figures. Clarke, who this year oversaw an 80 percent year-on-year rise at the mailonline.com, is credited with being the visionary responsible for the Daily Mail’s online popularity. As previously discussed by the SFN blog, Clarke was quick to realize that a newspaper’s website could be a brand in its own right, distinct from its mother publication and therefore capable of attracting and retaining a much wider audience. Whereas other UK titles are looking to reduce staff numbers and editorial budgets, the MailOnline site is set to hire more web journalists as it expands overseas.

Other digital news ventures struggled in the main Media 100 list, which is unsurprising given the modest revenue such projects tend to generate.

Despite Plunkett’s insistence that this year’s list differs greatly from that of 2011, it is difficult to gauge whether or not significant change has occurred in the news media landscape using the Guardian Media 100 alone. Rather, the MediaGuardian 100 2012 appears to present a news industry in which digital has yet to become a prominent force, even though it is central to the future strategies of the majority of news titles.

Sources: The Guardian

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-17 18:48

In a business climate of plummeting advertising and circulation revenue that has seen editorial budgets slashed, newsroom functions outsourced, legacy obligations become an ever increasing burden and print days reduced, you might be forgiven for thinking that the future of newspapers was cause for concern for editors and owners.

However, a survey conducted by the Missouri School of Journalism’s Reynolds Journalism Institute (RJI) has revealed remarkable levels of optimism in the newsrooms of U.S. daily newspapers – and significant faith in the power of print.

The RJI held telephone interviews with 485 news publishers and senior newspaper executives, who together represent one-third of the daily news titles in the U.S., as part of its annual Publishers Confidence Index. Full details of the report’s findings on the state of print and digital revenues, online news and mobile devices will be released in the coming months but a statement released by the RJI on 13 September attests to the ongoing importance of print publications in an industry widely thought to be preparing for a digital future.

While The Times-Picayune is cutting back its print publication from seven days to three, 77 percent of those questioned said their company had never considered eliminating a day of publication. Of those publishers who could envision a day when print was obsolete (33 percent), 46 percent believed it would happen in 10 to 20 years, 19 percent thought it would happen in less than 10 years and 14 percent could not envisage it occurring "for at least 20 years." Meanwhile 62 percent could not envisage a time when their organisation would not publish a print edition.

When questioned about their thoughts on the future of newspapers, 25 percent of the editors, owners and publishers quizzed by the RJI said they were “very optimistic,” 40 percent were “somewhat optimistic,” 31 percent were “neutral” and only 4 percent were “not optimistic.” There would seem to be a direct correlation between the circulation figures for a newspaper and the degree of optimism its executives had for the future: 83 percent of the publishers who made up the “very optimistic” category were from daily titles with an average of less than 50,000 weekday readers.

Described by the RJI as “the largest survey of its kind,” the report offers an insight into the thoughts of the people leading U.S. newspapers through a time of economic difficulties and a revolutionary digital transition. The responses gathered from a significant portion of the U.S. news industry would seem to indicate that, though certain news outlets like the Times-Picayune and JRC are seeking to experiment with digital opportunities, many are unwilling to abandon thoughts of a print-based future.

Sources: Jim Romenesko, NewsandTech

Author

Amy Hadfield's picture

Amy Hadfield

Date

2012-09-14 15:40

My account

WAN-IFRA Blogs


© 2013 WAN-IFRA - World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers

Footer Navigation